Evaluation of Extinguish®, Distance®, Combination of
Distance and Amdro® and the Two-Step Method for
Suppression of Red Imported Fire Ants in Turf


Glen C. Moore
Extension Agent-Entomology
Cooperator: Heritage Baptist Church

 

Summary: This trial evaluated the performance of 2 new IGR baits, Extinguish® (s-methoprene) and Distance® (pyriproxyfen) at 1 lb/ac and a combination of Distance at 0.5 lb./ac plus Amdro® (hydramethylnon) at 0.5 lb./ac and the Two-Step method employing Extinguish at 1 lb./ac followed by individual mound treatments of Orthene® 75S (acephate) at 2 tsp./mound for suppression of red imported fire ants in turf. These treatments were applied in the spring of 1999 and compared to an untreated check.

The Two-Step Method and the combination treatment of Distance® and Amdro® afforded a significantly higher reduction in mound numbers at 2 weeks after treatment. At six weeks after treatment, there was not observed to be a significant difference in the reduction of mound numbers between Distance, the combination treatment of Distance and Amdro and the Two-Step Method. Results were the same at 12 weeks after treatment, with these treatments being significantly different than Extinguish® and the untreated check. A fall inspection made at 22 weeks after treatment revealed that Extinguish, Distance, the combination treatment of Distance plus Amdro and the Two-Step Method were all equally efficacious and significantly better than the untreated check.

 

Problem
The red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, is prevalent throughout the North Central Texas area where they are a nuisance, interfering with man's activities and sometimes their sting is cause for medical concerns. Although management of fire ants around urban areas is highly desirable, some treatment options are costly. Additionally, registration of new IGR baits, Extinguish® and Distance® warrant testing to determine short term and long term efficacy.

 

Objective
The primary objective was to evaluate the performance of the new IGR baits, Extinguish® (s-methoprene) and Distance® (pyriproxyfen), as well as a combination treatment of Distance and Amdro® (hydramethylnon) and the Two-Step Method employing Extinguish followed by individual mound treatments of Orthene® 75S (acephate) in comparison to an untreated check. Equally important, was to compare the cost of treatments.

 

Materials and Methods
On April 20, 1999, broadcast applications of Extinguish® at 1 lb./ac, Distance® at 1 lb./ac, and a combination treatment of Distance at 0.5 lb./ac plus Amdro® at 0.5 lb./ac, were made to 1/4 acre plots on the Heritage Baptist Church grounds near Waxahachie, Texas. Additionally, Extinguish at 1 lb./ac was broadcast over same size plots as the initial phase of the Two-Step Method. To complete the Two-Step treatment, individual mound treatments were made to active mounds by applying 2 tsp's of Orthene® 75S directly to mounds. Application of baits were made with a hand-held scatter box calibrated to deliver 1 lb of bait material per acre. Treatments were replicated three times in a randomized fashion.

Plots measuring 1/4 acre each, were created by staking one end of a string measuring 58 ft in length in the center of individual plots to be designated and with the string stretched walking in a circular pattern around the plot. Pre-treatment mound densities were recorded for each plot prior to treatment. Post-treatment inspections were made by recording the number of active mounds per 1/4 acre plots at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 22 weeks after treatment. Data was submitted to Dr. Charles Barr, Extension Program Specialist - Fire Ant Project, for analysis.

 

Results
Only the Two-Step Method employing Extinguish® at 1 lb./ac followed by individual mound treatments of Orthene® 75S at 2 tsp. and the combination of Distance® at 0.5 lb./ac and Amdro® at 0.5 lb./ac provided a significantly higher reduction in active mound numbers at 2 weeks after treatment (Table 1). During the sixth through twelve week period after treatment, there was not observed to be a significant difference in the reduction of mound numbers between Distance, the combination treatment of Distance and Amdro and the Two-Step Method. All three were equally efficacious being significantly different than Extinguish® and the untreated check. A fall inspection made at 22 weeks after treatment revealed that Extinguish, Distance, the combination treatment of Distance plus Amdro and the Two-Step Method were all equally efficacious and significantly better than the untreated check. Percent reduction in mound numbers at 2, 6, 12, and 22 weeks after treatment and the cost per acre for treatments are illustrated in Table 2. Reduction in mound numbers in the untreated check was largely the result of hot and dry conditions during July, August and September.

 

Economic Analysis
The per acre cost for a broadcast application of Extinguish®, Distance®, and the combination treatment of Distance plus Amdro® varied only slightly ranging from $11.78/ac to $11.88/ac. While the Two-Step Method provided the most immediate reduction in mound numbers, it was the most expensive with Extinguish at $11.88/per acre plus Orthene® 75S costing $0.19 per mound.

 

Conclusion
The new IGR baits, Extinguish and Distance, was observed to be highly efficacious as fire ant control agents. Although Extinguish did not provide a significant reduction in mound numbers until after 12 weeks, it ultimately provided long term control equal to that of Distance, the Two-Step Method employing Extinguish plus Orthene 75S and the combination treatment of Distance plus Amdro.

 

Acknowledgments:
Much gratitude is extended to Heritage Baptist church for serving as demonstrating cooperator. Appreciation is also extended to the following representatives and companies for product availability: Mr. Doug VanGundy of Wellmark International and Ms. Pam Kanoekfi of Valent. Also, a special thanks is due Dr. Bart Drees, Extension Fire Ant Coordinator and Dr. Charles Barr, Extension Program Fire Ant Specialist for data analysis.


Table 1: Efficacy of Extinguish™, Distance®, a combination of Distance plus Amdro® and the Two-Step Method employing Extinguish and Orthene® for red imported fire ant suppression of ornamental turf in comparison to an untreated check, Heritage Baptist Church, Ellis County, Texas, 1999.

MEAN NUMBER OF ACTIVE FIRE ANT MOUNDS/0.25 ACRE.
Treatment
Pretreatment
Post Treatment
   
2 weeks
4 weeks
6 weeks
8 weeks
12 weeks
22 weeks
Two-Step Method Extinguish®/Orthene®75S - 1 lb./ac - 2 tsp./md
5.67 (a)
0.33 (c)*
0 .00 (c)
0.00 (b)
0.00 (c)
0.00 (b)
0.00 (b)
Distance®/Amdro® - 1/2 lb/ac + 1/2 lb/ac
4.0 (a)
1.33 (b c)
0.33 (c)
0.00 (b)
0.00 (c)
0.00 (b)
0.00 (b)
Distance® - 1 lb/ac
5.0 (a)
3.00 (a b c)
1.33 (b c)
0.67 (b)
0.33 (b c)
0.33 (b)
0.00 (b)
Extinguish® - 1 lb/ac
5.67 (a)
5.67 (a b)
4.67 (a b)
4.67 (a)
4.00 (a b)
4.00 (a)
0.33 (b)
untreated control
7.33 (a)
7.0 (a)
7.67 (a)
6.33 (a)
5.67 (a)
5.00 (a)
6.66 (a)

* Means with the same letter are not significantly different, Analysis of Variance, Tukey's Studentized Range (HSD) Test for Variance

Back to Results


Table 2: Percent reduction in mound numbers at 2, 8 and 22 weeks after treatment and cost per acre for three fire ant bait treatments and the Two-Step method, Heritage Baptist Church, Ellis County, Texas, 1999

MEAN PERCENT REDUCTION IN MOUND NUMBERS/0.25 ACRE
Post Treatment
Treatment
2 weeks
6 weeks
12 weeks
22 weeks
Cost Per Acre
Two-Step Method Extinguish®/Orthene® 75S - 1 lb./ac - 2 tsp./md
94
100
100
100
$11.88 + $0.19/mound
Distance®/Amdro® - 1/2 lb/ac + 1/2 lb/ac
66
100
100
100
$5.94 + $5.89
Distance® - 1 lb/ac
40
87
94
100
$11.88
Extinguish® - 1 lb/ac
0
17
29
94
$11.88
untreated control
4
4
32
9
---

Back to Problem

Back to Objective

Back to Materials and Methods

Back to Results

Back to Economic Analysis

Back to Conclusion

Back to Contents


Click  to view the entire report in ".pdf" format so the document can be easily and accurately printed.. Adobe Acrobat Reader will launch automatically. If you do not have Adobe Acrobat Reader, click
to download a free copy.