The application of dust formulations to individual mounds of the red
imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, is a widely accepted method
because of the low cost and low labor required for treatment. The per mound
treatment cost is estimated to be about $0.15 for Ortho® Ant-Stop®
Orthene® Fire Ant Killer (Solaris) or Orthene® Turf, Tree and Ornamental
Spray (Valent U.S.A.), both 75% wettable powder formulations of acephate.
Use of water as a diluent or applied after treatment is not required
or suggested as is the common practice for most individual fire ant mound
treatments. This trial was conducted to evaluate new formulations of 75%
acephate. In addition, a formulation of the pyrethroid cyfluthrin, Tempo®
0.1% Dust (Bayer Agric. Div.) was evaluated.
Materials and Methods
Trial 1. This trial was conducted behind the dam at Lake Somerville,
in Burleson Co., Texas. Twenty plots, 30 ft. wide, were established so
that each plot contained ten fire ant mounds, thus varying in length. Each
mound was marked with a field flag. Plot lengths were arrayed from longest
to shortest and divided into 4 blocks or replicates. Treatments were then
assigned randomly to one plot within each block. Treatments were applied
16 May 1995. Three formulations of Orthene® Fire Ant Killer (75% acephate
SP) and Tempo® 0.1% Dust (cyfluthrin) were evaluated and compared to
an untreated check (three treatments, total). Treatments were applied as
topical dusts to red imported fire ant mounds according to manufacturers'
instructions. Amounts of material used varied with mound size for Tempo®
0.1% Dust:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Periodically (7, 14 and 30 days) following treatment, treated mounds were inspected for ant mounding activity using the minimal disturbance method. On the last evaluation date, plots were also inspected for additional ant mounds, representing immigrant colonies and/or "satellite" mounds formed by survivors of initially-treated mounds. Results were analyzed using Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA) and means separated using Tukey's Studentized Range Test (P < 0.05).
Trial 2. Twenty plots, variable in length and ranging from 22 to 45 ft. in width and containing ten active red imported fire ants (polygyne form) each were established, September 26, 1995, along a road side bordering Royalty Pecans, Burleson County, Texas. Plots were arrayed by plot length and divided in to four blocks (replicates). Treatments were randomly assigned to each block. Treatments and rates included:
Ant mounds were considered active is 12 or more ants emerged from the
top of the mound displaying defensive behavior after minimal disturbance.
All active mounds were marked with plot flags. Periodically after treatment
(3, 7, 14 and 30 days), treated mounds were evaluated for activity. Results
were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means were separated
using Tukey's Studentized Range Test (P < 0.05).
Trial 1. The experimental formulations of acephate 75% WP were developed to overcome the objectionable mercaptan based odor of the current formulations. These new formulations appeared to contain perfuming masking agents: SF-18881, NB# 5608530 smelled somewhat like almonds and SF-18898, NB# 5608530 smelled something like carpet freshener. Although in casual contact these formulations smelled similar to cleaning products, the odors could become overpowering during instances of higher exposure that occasionally happen during application.
All acephate 75% WP formulations tested performed statistically similar during the course of this trial (Table 1), although numerically more "new" mounds were documented in the plots treated with the experimental formulations 4 weeks after treatment. Ant mounds in cyfulthrin (Tempo® 0.1% Dust) treated plots declined more slowly over time, and these plots contained numerically higher numbers of "new" mounds at the end of the trial. Although active ant mound numbers slowly declined in untreated plots over the course of time, most likely because of hot weather and little rain, total mound numbers within each set of treatment plots at the end of the trial indicate that only those treated with Ortho® Ant-Stop® Orthene® Fire Ant Killer contained fewer mounds than did untreated plots, providing 96.7 percent suppression of mound numbers.
Trial 2. Statistically, all acephate formulations tested performed similarly, providing 100 percent elimination of ant activity in treated mounds within 1 week (Table 2). Numerically, SF 18898 did not perform as well as other treatments. Satellite mound formation was not significantly different between treatments at the end of the monitoring period.
Velocity is sold in 12 oz. shaker cans with instructions to use 2 tablespoons per mound. Two cans treated 35 mounds (17.5 mounds per can). The Spread Rite G applicator provided by the manufacturer of Velocity was used to treat mounds in two plots (#6 &19) using the disc with a 1/4 inch hole in the cap and counting up to 8 while sprinkling granules on and around the mounds. We found this device to be quick and easy to use.
Table 1. Number of active red imported
fire ant mounds of ten following 16 may 1995 application of dust treatments
using Ortho® Ant-Stop® Orthene® Fire Ant Killer (acephate 75%
WP), two additional acephate 75% WP formulations (SF-18881, NB# 568530
and SF-18898, NB# 5608530) or Tempo® 0.1% Dust (cyfluthrin), Trial
1, Burleson Co., Texas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Untreated | 9.25 a | 7.75 a | 7.75 a | 5.25 a | 2.50 a | 7.75 a |
| Orthene® | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 0.25 c | 0.25 b | 0.00 a | 0.25 b |
| SF-18881 | 0.25 c | 0.00 c | 0.00 c | 1.25 b | 1.25 a | 2.50 ab |
| SF-18898 2 | 0.75 c | 0.50 c | 0.00 c | 0.50 b | 1.75 a | 2.25 ab |
| Tempo® | 5.75 b | 4.75 b | 2.50 b | 1.00 b | 4.25 a | 5.25 ab |
| F | 21.54 | 52.30 | 65.33 | 4.71 | 1.37 | 2.47 |
| P | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0094 | 0.3023 | 0.0811 |
| MSE | 1.8500 | 0.5417 | 0.3917 | 2.0583 | 4.9583 | 8.5000 |
| Min. sig diff. | 3.0656 | 1.6588 | 1.4106 | 3.2337 | 5.0188 | 6.5712 |
| Critical value = 4.508 | ||||||
| d.f. = 12 |
Table 2. Number of active red imported
fire ant mounds of ten following application of individual mound treatments,
Burleson Co., Texas, treated 26 September 1995.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Orthene® | 0.00b | 0.00b | 0.00b | 0.00b | 1.50 | 1.75b |
| SF 18881 | 0.25b | 0.00b | 0.00b | 0.00b | 1.00 | 1.00b |
| SF 18898 | 0.50b | 0.00b | 0.00b | 0.25b | 3.00 | 3.25b |
| Velocity® | 0.00b | 0.00b | 0.00b | 0.00b | 2.50 | 2.50b |
| untreated control | 9.50a | 9.50a | 7.50a | 7.50a | 3.25 | 10.75a |
| F | 183.5 | 619.29 | 58.6 | 73.05 | 1.07 | 12.48 |
| P | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.4360 | 0.0001 |
| MSE | 0.2167 | 0.0667 | 0.4333 | 0.3417 | 3.8830 | 3.0250 |
| MSD | 1.0491 | 0.5819 | 1.4836 | 1.3174 | 4.4414 | 3.9200 |
| df=12 | ||||||
| crit.=4.508 |
* Means in columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means were separated using Tukey's Studentized Range Test (P < 0.05).