Sodium arsenate (Fatsco® Ant Poison) and related compounds such
as arsenic trioxide (Grant's Kills Ants®) have been formulated as containerized
bait stations for use indoors to eliminate house-infesting ants. Some of
these products have been marketed for the control of the red imported fire
ant (RIFA), Solenopsis invicta (Buren). These tests were conducted
to evaluate the effectiveness of these bait stations for eliminating laboratory
and field RIFA colonies.
Materials and Methods
Laboratory trial: Eight field-collected standardized RIFA colonies
were established and maintained under laboratory conditions and feeding
schedule. On 29 March, 1989, four of these colonies were exposed to cotton
balls (20mm diameter) saturated in the 3 percent sodium arsenic Fatsco
Ant Poison solution. One sodium arsenate saturated cotton ball was placed
in each 55mm diameter ant cup provided by Fatsco as a tamper proof bait
station. Four other cotton balls were saturated with distilled water and
placed in bait station to serve as controls. The ant colonies were exposed
simultaneously. The number of worker ants, number of queens (dealate females)
and the presence and type of brood (reproductive or worker) was determined
prior to and following exposure of the colonies to the bait stations. The
number of ants per colony for each post-treatment evaluation was subjected
to analysis of variance using the Least Significant Difference test (P
0.05).
On 13 April, 1989, this trial was repeated. However, the cotton balls
in the bait stations were re-treated (with 2 droppers full of solution)
every 2 to 3 days until 1 May, 1989, using a total of two 2 fl oz bottles
of Fatsco or 1 fl oz per colony during the test period. Data and analysis
was performed as described above.
Field trial: On 5 July, 1989, 30 RIFA mounds were located, marked
with plot flags and numbered consecutively in 0.25 of a 0.25-acre circular
plot (0.063-acre) established at the A&M Riverside Campus. A Fatsco
Ant Poison cup, containing a cotton ball, was placed near each mound. In
an adjoining 0.063-acre quarter circle and left as a control. On 6 July,
5 ml of Fatsco Ant Poison were added to each cup. The cups were recharged
tree more times, approximately every four days with additional 5 ml doses.
Each mound received a cumulative dose of 20 ml of Fatsco Ant Poison during
the three week treatment period.
Mound evaluations were conducted weekly with each mound receiving a
"+" or "-" indicating whether ants came to the surface with light mound
disturbance. Evaluations were conducted at approximately 10:00 a.m. The
final evaluation was conducted by digging the mound, observing brood presence
and giving the mound an index value (Banks, 1986). New mounds in the two
plots were also documented to determine charges in mound density. For analysis,
the 30 sequentially-numbered mound sets in the treated and untreated plots
were subdivided into 6 subsets of 5 mounds. The number of active RIFA mound
within each subset was determined for each evaluation date, used to calculate
plot means and subjected to analysis using the Students t test (P 0.05).
This procedure was also used to analyze resulting mound index values.
Results and Discussion
Laboratory trial: Prior to exposure to Fatsco ant bait (29 March,
1989), the eight laboratory colonies used for these trials were similar
in vigor and reproductive status:
| No. workers | No. Queens | Reproductive Worker | |||
| Treatment | Colony | (1000's) | brood | brood | |
| Fatsco Ant Poison | 18 | 40 | 1 | - | + |
| (Sodium arsenate) | 27 | 40 | 45 | - | + |
| 26 | 40 | 25 | - | + | |
| 16 | 40 | 25 | - | + | |
| Untreated | 20 | 50 | 60 | - | + |
| 24 | 40 | 40 | - | + | |
| 19 | 40 | 15 | - | + | |
| 23 | 40 | 15 | - | + | |
The Fatsco Ant Poison was Found to be difficult to dispense safely with
the cups provided. In liquid form, the sodium arsenate formulation can
spill easily either when dispensing the solution or after the material
has been placed in the cups. A safer application method should be developed
to avoid accidental contamination to the user and the environment. Once
the material had dried in the cup, then cotton ball was hardened and adhered
tightly to the green vessel. Instructions for disposal of contaminated
materials were not provided.
Results of these trials are similar to those obtained form test using
arsenic trioxide bail stations. In that test, conducted 26 September 1988,
three standard laboratory colonies were exposed to the bait stations and
evaluated relative to 3 untreated colonies. The test was monitored until
17 October, 21 days following initial exposure. No elimination of worker
brood or queen ants was documented, and no reduction in colony vigor was
observed.
The arsenic (or arsenate) compounds tested for RIFA control failed
to eliminate colonies. Apparently, the number of ants associated with a
RIFA colony decreased the ability of these slow acting stomach poisons
to reach and affect the queen ants. Although some worker ants may have
been eliminated, sufficient numbers of worker (nurse) ants survived to
care for the queen(s) and (diminished) brood.
Boric acid baits, registered for indoor ant control, are not know to
effectively eliminate RIFA colonies. However, another bait, Raid® Max
Ant Bait, containing sulfonamide (N-ethyl perfluorochlansulfonamide, 0.5%)
and registered for control of ants indoors (black carpenter ants, Argentine
ants, cornfield ants and pharaoh ants), has eliminated RIFA colonies in
a similar (non-replicated) laboratory test. Amdro® (hydramethylnon)
is also known to be an other hydramethylnon formulations (Combat® and
Maxforce® bait stations) are registered for the control of other ant
species indoors. These products may show promise for indoor RIFA control
using a bait-station approach. However, in the absence of an effective
bait registered for indoor RIFA control , current management tactics are
restricted to surface treatments (emulsifiable concentrate, liquid, wettable
powder, dust or granule formulations) to eliminate foraging working ants
or fumigants (aerosols formulations) and injectable (dust, aerosols, sprays)
materials to treat colonies detected inside wall voids or other structures
(Drees and Vinson 1989, Owens 1983).
________
Banks, W.A. 1986. Control of imported fire ants with new insect growth regulator and fluorocarbon baits. Proc. 1986 Imported Fire Ant Conference (M. E. Mispagel, ed.). Univ. Ga, Athens, GA pp. 76-82.
Drees, B. M. and S. B. Vinson. 1989. Fire ants and their control. B-1536. Texas Agriculture Extension Service. Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas. 12 pp.
Owens, J. M. 1983. House infesting ants. L-2061. Texas A&M University
System, College Station, Texas. 4pp.
Table 1. Estimated of red imported fire
ants and presence of worker brood per colony during a Fatsco Ant Poison
(3% sodium arsenate) treatment period conducted from 13 April through 1
May, 1989, during which colonies received a total of 1 fl oz solution dispensed
over 2 to 3 day intervals relative to untreated colonies.
| ----April---- | --------------May-------------- | June | |||||
| Treatment | 17 | 24 | 1 | 8 | 15 | 22 | 13 |
| No. ants (thousands)/colony | |||||||
| sodium arsenate | 30* | 22 | 22 | 18* | 14* | 11* | 8* |
| untreated | 45 | 22 | 22 | 34 | 30 | 31 | 23 |
| Worker brood | |||||||
| Sodium arsenate | ++++ | few+ | few+ | ++++ | -+++ | ++++ | -+++ |
| untreated | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++++ |
* Means significantly different (P0.05) according to the Student, s
t test.
Table 2. Active red imported fire ant mounds
in 6 sets of 5 mounds following a 5 to 26 July 1989 treatment program in
which mounds received weekly 5 ml doses (20 ml total) of sodium arsenate
(Fatsco Ant Poison), relative to sets of untreated mounds, Brazos County,
Texas.
| Treatment | 4 Aug. | 10 Aug. | 21 Aug. | 25 Aug. | 30 Aug. |
|
|
|||||
| untreated | 5.0±0.0* | 4.0±1.3 | 4.2±1.0 | 3.7±1.0* | 3.8±0.9 |
| sodium arsenate | 4.2±0.8* | 3.2±1.7 | 3.0±1.7 | 2.2±1.7* | 3.1±1.7 |
| t | -2.7116 | -09552 | -1.4725 | -1.8495 | -0.8617 |
| P | 0.0109* | 0.1810 | 0.0858 | 0.0486* | 0.2045 |
| D.F. = 10 | |||||
* indicates significant difference in means in columns using the Student's
t test (P 0.05).