Bait-formulated products containing fenoxycarb (Logic® and Award®)
for suppressing the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis
invicta Buren, are registered for use as broadcast and individual
mound treatments. When applied as a broadcast application, 1.0 to 1.5 lbs.
of the formulated materials per acre are to be applied using special broadcast
application equipment. These products are currently formulated as baits
containing 1.0 percent active fenoxycarb. The trials reported here were
evaluations of lower rates (0.50 and 0.25 percent) fenoxycarb formulations.
Materials and Methods
Trial 1. This trial was initiated, 29 July 1991, on the J.B. Evans Turf Farm in Algoa, Texas. The site was an abandoned turf farm and adjacent abandoned field. The fields were overgrown St. Augustine grass and had been recently mowed. There was a considerable amount of litter on the surface of the turf area.
The experimental design consisted of three replications (blocks), with four treatment plots each. Treatments were randomized within each block. Each treatment plot consisted of a square, 150 feet on a side, or 0.51 acres. Counts of active fire ant mounds were made within a 0.25 acre circular subplot inside each half-acre plot, using a string 58 feet long anchored in the plot center. Ant mounds were considered active if ants ran up to the mound surface within 5 to 10 seconds of light disturbance with a shovel handle (minimal disturbance method). Counts were made either before noon or after 5:00 pm. to maximize ant response. In addition, on 3 Sept. treatment plots were monitored to determine if the fenoxycarb treatments had affected the ant mounds. Four plots, one from each treatment, were evaluated by opening each mound and looking for the presence of worker brood (larvae and pupae).
The following treatments were included: 1) untreated control; 2) fenoxycarb bait 1% (Logic® Fire Ant Bait); 3) fenoxycarb bait 0.5%; and 4) fenoxycarb bait 0.25%. All baits were applied, 30-31 July, at a rate of 1.5 lbs per acre using a Cyclone® Model 1C1 hand seeder operated from the tailgate of a moving truck. Plots were monitored for ant mound activity 8 weeks, 3, 7, 12 and 18 months following application of treatments. Resulting ant mound counts per plot were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and means were separated using Tukey's Studentized Range test (P < 0.05).
Trial 2. This trial was located on the back side of the earthen dam impounding Lake Somerville. The area is federally owned and managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Access is tightly restricted to maintenance and monitoring personnel only. The area is gently sloping with small water diversion terraces through the middle. Vegetation is primarily native grass. Mowing is done, at most, three times per year. Mowing had just been completed at the onset of the trial. The total area available for the test was approximately 400 feet wide and 4,000 feet long.
Plots were established, 22 Aug. 1991 in adjoining columns, two plots wide and 8 long. Due to a severe decrease in ant mound numbers, a second block of four adjoining plots was laid out at the opposite end of the dam where mound numbers were more consistent. The 20 plots allowed for four replications (blocks) of the four treatments to be assigned randomly within each block. Two additional sets of two plots were established for untreated control and 1 percent fenoxycarb treatments. The plots were identical in size to those in Trial 1 and treatments, applied 26 Aug. 1991 (4:00 to 8:00 pm), were also identical. Fire ant mound density was monitored as in Trial 1. Active ant mounds were monitored in each plot 8 weeks, 3, 12 and 18 months following treatment.
Results were analyzed as those of Trial 1, and results from both trials
were analyzed as one. Finally, a linear regression analysis was conducted
on the percent reduction in active ant mounds (calculated from pre-treatment
levels) at 7 and 12 months after treatment, using results from both trials.
Results and Discussion
Trial 1. The 1 percent fenoxycarb bait (Logic®) application was made the evening of 30 July. The remaining treatments were applied 31 July before 11:45 a.m. According to the owner, a brief, heavy thunderstorm occurred at approximately 4:30 p.m. Since the bait formulation, composed of defatted corn grit, is effectively dissolved by moisture, the low rate bait particles had less than 5 hours to be collected by foraging ants. This concern prompted the establishment of the second trial. On 3 Sept., no worker brood was noted in the fenoxycarb treatment plots while large numbers were present in the untreated control plot mounds. This finding indicated that the rain that fell shortly following treatment did not affect the ants' retrieval of the product.
All treatments significantly reduced the number of active fire ant mounds beginning 3 months after treatment (Table 1). Curiously, the 1 percent fenoxycarb formulation was slower to suppress ants than the other two formulations, and did not produce a significant level of suppression after 18 months. Statistically, the 0.5 and 0.25 percent formulations performed equally well in this trial. Maximum suppression of active ant mounds from fenoxycarb bait occurred 7 months following treatment (85 to 98 percent reduction relative to untreated plots on that date).
Trial
2. One plot (replicate I, below) at Somerville maintained unusually
high ant mound numbers. This area apparently contained a source of water
such as a seep since Johnson grass grew heavily there. Analysis using this
plot was attempted, but the decision was made to substitute data from one
of the other two 1.0 percent fenoxycarb bait treated plots (Plot VI) for
analysis of data from the evaluation of the three formulations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| pre-count | 108 | 49 | 58 | 41 | 10 | 7 |
| 2 weeks | 77 | 31 | 37 | 32 | 15 | 8 |
| 6 weeks | 37 | 17 | 14 | 30 | 14 | 7 |
| 3 months | 42 | 8 | 13 | 9 | 11 | 6 |
| 7 months | 55 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 8 |
| 1 year | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| 18 months | 35 | 2 | 23 | 26 | 12 | 11 |
In this trial, significant reductions from fenoxycarb bait treatments did not occur until 7 months after application (Table 1), when percent suppression ranged from 77.0 to 91.4 relative to untreated plots on that date. Significant levels of suppression lasted for one year. By 18 months after treatment, active mound numbers had increased. All treatments performed equally well, statistically.
Analysis of data from both trials, again, documents that the fenoxycarb formulations performed equally well from seven months to a year after treatments (Table 2). The 1.0 percent fenoxycarb bait (Logic®) suppressed active ant mounds more quickly (by 3 months).
Linear regression analysis suggests that there may be an influence of initial mound density on the level of active ant mound suppression resulting from a 1% fenoxycarb bait (Logic®) application, particularly after 1 year of treatment (Table 3). In particular, efficacy seems to be lower when applied to plots with low densities of fire ant mounds. Omitting Plot I data from Trial 2 greatly changes the equation for the line, particularly at seven months after treatment. Although the results of this analysis are preliminary, additional data points from other trials may render results definitive. Implications of the pre-treatment ant mound density effect on product performance justify, to some extent, excluding data from Trial 1 plot I data in the analysis presented here. Furthermore, these results support the technique of arraying pre-treatment ant mound counts in plots from low to high density and assigning blocks according to these density increments. This method has been used on all subsequent studies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| untreated control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1% fenoxycarb (Logic®) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.5% fenoxycarb bait |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.25% fenoxycarb bait |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different using analysis of variance (PROC ANOVA) and the Tukey's Studentized Range Test (P < 0.05; d.f. = 8; Range = 4.529)(PC SAS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| untreated control | 24.00b | 22.75c | 18.00a | 21.25a | 34.75a | 22.25a | 33.00a |
| 1.00% fenoxycarb | 38.75ab | 27.00bc | 17.00a | 9.00a | 3.00b | 1.50b | 15.50a |
| 0.50% fenoxycarb | 64.75a | 46.50ab | 22.25a | 18.75a | 4.25b | 1.75b | 12.50a |
| 0.25% fenoxycarb | 62.50a | 51.50a | 20.75a | 19.25a | 8.00b | 2.75b | 18.75a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 2. Numbers of active red imported
fire ant mounds before and after treatment with a broadcast application
of 1.5 lbs. per acre fenoxycarb (Logic®) bait formulations, Trials
1 and 2, Galveston and Burleson Counties, Texas, 1991-1993.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| untreated control | 31.43a | 23.00a | 35.00a | 17.71a | 33.43a |
| 1.0% fenoxycarb bait | 36.57a | 7.29b | 4.00b | 2.43b | 18.57ab |
| 0.5% fenoxycarb bait | 50.14a | 11.43ab | 3.29b | 1.86b | 13.71b |
| 0.25% fenoxycarb bait | 50.71a | 12.29ab | 5.00b | 3.14b | 16.14b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different using analysis of variance (PROC GLM) and the Tukey's Studentized Range Test (P < 0.05; d.f. = 23; Range = 3.914)(PC SAS). Sites were not significantly different unless noted.
** Sites statistically different for this post-treatment date:
site
F = 5.75
P = .0250
treatment F = 3.81
P = .0237
Table 3. Linear regression analysis
of percent reduction of red imported fire ant mounds from the application
of 1 percent fenoxycarb bait (Logic®) at seven and twelve months after
treatment versus the initial ant mound density, Burleson and Galveston
Counties, Texas, 1991-1993.
Model: Y = MX + B
where Y=percent reduction; X=initial density; M=slope; and B=Y intercept
At seven months, all plots: Y = 0.638X +36.293
F = 1.743
P = 0.2283
At seven months, Plot I omitted: Y = 2.358X -13.903
F = 60.411
P = 0.0002
At 1 year, all plots: Y = 0.317X +74.113
F = 7.560
P = 0.0285
At 1 year, Plot I omitted: Y = 0.661X +64.096
F = 24.300
P = 0.0026