Velocity® (Valent U.S.A. Corp.)
is a 15% granular acephate formulation that is similar to Orthene®
Turf, Tree and Ornamental (TT&O) Spray or Ortho®
Ant-Stop™ Ant Killer Dust (75% acephate
dust) in method of application and mode of activity. It is marketed as
a low-dust and low-odor alternative. This trial was conducted to evaluate
this new formulation compared to four other treatments including Orthene®
TT&O, a granular bifenthrin product (Talstar®
T&O 0.2G) and control treatments.
Materials and Methods
Test plots were established by marking all active mounds with survey
flags contained within a strip 30 feet wide and indeterminate length along
an abandoned runway on the Texas A&M Riverside Campus, Brazos Co.,
Texas. Mound activity was determined using the minimal disturbance technique.
Once ten mounds were marked, flag color was changed for the next ten and
so on. Flags were then placed along one edge of the strip and numbered
sequentially to divide the groups of ten mounds into plots. Plot width
was then measured using a measuring wheel. These widths were arrayed from
lowest to highest and divided into four equal groups to represent four
replications. Treatments were randomly assigned within replications. The
following treatments were applied on 7 October:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weather during application was partly cloudy with a temperatures ranging
from approximately 80 to 90 degrees Fahrenheit. Soil was moderately moist.
Treated mound evaluations were conducted 10, 15 and 23 October and 6 November
1996 using the minimal disturbance technique. The plots were surveyed for
"satellite" mounds 9 October. Results were analyzed using PC SAS PROC Analysis
of Variance (ANOVA), with means separated by Tukey's studentized range
test (P < 0.05).
All treatments resulted in significant active ant mound reductions in treatment plots throughout the trial compared to both water-only and untreated control treatment plot mound number. There were no significant differences in the number of "new", satellite mounds occurring in plots between treatments. Total active mound numbers (treated mounds + "new" mounds) were significantly lower for all treatments versus controls at 7 days. At one month, all treatments were significantly different from the untreated control, but not from the water-drench control. Due to the rather small size of the treated mounds, it is not surprising that water-drenched mounds were more likely to relocated than untreated ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pinpoint |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tals T&O |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Orthene(std.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CK Drench |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CK Dry |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
* Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P < 0.05) using PC SAS ANOVA and Tukey's Studentized Range test for mean separation.